The 9/11 truth movement
There are two groups of people in the world:
  • those who have a very superficial knowledge of what happened on 9/11, and
  • those who have concerns that we may not have been told the whole truth

If you think you have more than a superficial knowledge about 9/11, try answering these questions:

  • What was the evidence that the USA presented to NATO governments, prior to military action in Afghanistan, to justify that action?
  • How were the US authorities able to so quickly identify the 19 alleged hijackers?
  • What links have been proven between the hijackers and Osama Bin Laden?
  • What is the name of the 47-storey office tower that also collapsed on 9/11, and what caused its collapse?

"The attack on the World Trade Center was a tragedy for the people in the towers and in the airplanes, and a tragedy for their families. It also marked the beginning of the tragic war on terror. The current trends in Western society towards greater surveillance and the loss of civil rights can also only be called tragic. If we have also been lied to, the tragedy is complete."

This site presents the key arguments and evidence that have been most significant in changing the way we view 9/11. There is also a FAQ covering the most common questions people ask when they encounter the 9/11 truth movement.

 Questioning the 'official' account

In February 2003, Colin Powell made submissions to the UN about Saddam Hussein's comprehensive weapons of mass destruction program. These submissions later turned out to be based on dubious intelligence and outright falsehoods.

In a similar way, the official version of what happened on 9/11 has been "sold" to us rather than proven.

Take a moment to think about what you know about 9/11, and your sources for that information. Everyone has seen the images of a Boeing 757 crashing into the south tower of the World Trade Centre (WTC), and the subsequent collapse of the twin towers. But who was responsible for this attack and what is the evidence that proves this?

"Within days of the attacks, we were told that the perpetrators were from a terrorist network known as Al Qaeda. When reporters and members of the public asked for details, then Secretary of State Colin Powell promised that it would all be made clear to the world in a White Paper.

Nearly four years, and two wars later, we still have no official statement from the Bush administration on the specifics of who did it, who aided and financed them or what their origins are."

Were the alleged hijackers really capable of navigating and flying these sophisticated aircraft? How were the authorities able to so quickly identify them, and based on what evidence? Why did each of the twin towers completely disintegrate in a top down explosion? Why did WTC building 7 collapse, and why has the video footage received almost no media coverage? How could the US intelligence services and military fail so dismally in their duty to protect the American people, and why has no disciplinary action been taken? Could the alleged hijackers really have acted alone and without inside help or support?

"The 'Official Story' of what actually took place on 9-11 is a lie. We do not pretend to have put together a full and definitive account of how, and by whom, the attacks were carried out. But information reported in mainstream media, and viewed in the light of common sense and the laws of physics, demonstrate that the 'Official Story', examined closely, is not credible."

- Attorney Phil Berg

 Our aims
Our aims are to:
  • make people aware of this important global movement
  • demonstrate that there are very serious questions that need to be answered

We encourage people to:
  • have an open mind and feel the weight of the arguments rather than dismiss them out of hand
  • investigate and think for themselves, rather than relying on statements from the same official channels which deceived us about Iraqi WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction)
  • join with us in spreading this vital information and working to achieve political reform - locally and globally

"[We] believe that the government not only permitted 9/11 to occur but may even have orchestrated these events to facilitate its political agenda."

 9/11 precedent?

In 1962, the US military made plans to fabricate acts of terrorism and military aggression and blame them on Cuba, to provide a pretext for military intervention — Operation Northwoods

 9/11 song

Fantastic new song by Martin Noakes: 911 Building 7 (right-click for mp3 download). Music video onYouTube and GoogleVideo. Website:

 Key Points

Click here to see the best evidence and arguments that show there is more to 9/11 than we have been told.
Key points...

When people hear about the 9/11 truth movement they often ask the same questions.
See if your question is answered here...
Key points - FAQ - Links - Contact us